|
Vol. 13 Edition 3 - Fall 2002
|
If you have problems printing this page, try printing the
PDFs instead
Click on the title of an article to jump down to the full text
|
|
|
A NEW REGULATORY STRUCTURE FOR INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES IN FLORIDA
Travis L. Miller, Esq.
RADEY THOMAS YON & CLARK, P.A.
(850) 425-6654
The Florida Legislature has enacted several laws over the last decade profoundly affecting Florida's insurance markets.
CLICK HERE to view this article as a PDF
Back to Top
A GLOBAL DEFINITION OF TERRORISM
Thomas A. Player, Esq.
MORRIS, MANNING & MARTIN, L.L.P.
(404) 504-7623
Prior to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 in the United States, only a handful of countries maintained a state-supported backstop for losses caused by acts of terrorism.
CLICK HERE to view this article as a PDF
Back to Top
SUITABILITY IN THE SALE OF FIXED LIFE AND ANNUITY PRODUCTS
On Tuesday June 11, 2002, the last day of the June NAIC meeting in Philadelphia, the Life Insurance and Annuities (A) Committee held a long-awaited hearing on the Life Insurance and Annuities Suitability Model Act and Model Regulation.
CLICK HERE to view this article as a PDF
Back to Top
PRACTICAL ASPECTS IN THE FORMATION AND OPERATION OF CAPTIVES AND WORLDWIDE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROVISIONS
Alan J. Schmitz, Esq.
SCHMITZ & ASSOCIATES, PC
(720) 200-4242
Over thirty countries and territories worldwide have adopted legislation aimed at the identification, prevention, and reporting of suspicious money laundering transactions.
CLICK HERE to view this article as a PDF
Back to Top
THE D.C. CAPTIVE ACT: CAPITALIZING UPON INSURANCE MARKET OPPORTUNITIES
Kathy A. Steadman, Esq.
HENNELLY & STEADMAN PLC
(602) 230-7000
On August 4, 2000, the District of Columbia ("District") joined the trend of almost twenty U.S. jurisdictions by passing the Captive Insurance Company Act of 2000 ("Act"),1 thereby becoming a captive insurance company domicile, effective October 31, 2000.
CLICK HERE to view this article as a PDF
Back to Top
RAY OF SUNSHINE ON PUNITIVE DAMAGES
A routine insurance premium collection case for premium due on a commercial automobile policy in California, issued by the California Assigned Risk Plan ("CAARP"), resulted in a punitive damage award to the insured by the trial court.
CLICK HERE to view this article as a PDF
Back to Top
The FORC Journal is designed to provide practical and useful information, but not legal advice. If legal advice is required, please seek professional counsel. FORC does not endorse the views expressed in any of the articles contained in the FORC Journal.